Archive for the 'Commentary' Category

Aug 04 2008

The Future of Political Nonfiction

This site provides writing advice. If you're writing a superhero novel or comic book, please also read our superhero writing articles.

Would you like to subscribe to our RSS feed?

City Journal wrote a well-researched article on the future of conservative nonfiction, but I’d like to make a larger point about political nonfiction. “Since the new conservative imprints have far less latitude than traditional nonfiction imprints to fail, they tend to rely heavily on, and largely be defined by, a handful of proven iconic authors.” It’s probably true that smaller publishers have to be wary about rolling the dice with noncelebrities. But, because of blogging, I think that it’s tremendously difficult for a non-celebrity of any political persuasion to publish political nonfiction. Readers can find blogs that offer any style of political thought for free. Some blogs are exceedingly well-written and intelligent. So why would anyone want to pay for your opinion? Because you’re someone who has an invaluable perspective because you used to be a President, a secretary of state, or are a hugely popular talk-radio host, etc…*

Continue Reading »

No responses yet

Aug 03 2008

Why are mysteries more popular than fantasy or sci-fi?

Published by B. Mac under Commentary

Observations from the Balcony suggests it is because mysteries are helped more by cinema than other forms of literary fiction. I’d lay out two alternate theories: 1) it’s far easier to make a detective story intriguing and interactive, because the readers can solve the case alongside the detective. 2) The premises, particularly in detective mysteries, are easier to sell than exotic premises that use magic or advanced technology.

Additionally, I think it’s slightly easier to write mysteries…

Continue Reading »

One response so far

Jul 25 2008

Don’t Write for Yourself: You are Your Own Worst Reader

Published by B. Mac under Commentary

Today, a commenter at Nathan Bransford’s site said…

While I’m striving to write a book that I hope will be some kind of bestseller, I never forget that I’m also striving to write a book that *I* would want to read if I saw it on the shelf.

That is badly misguided. Whether you want to buy your book is irrelevant. You are not the audience of your book. Publishers do not want to publish a book for you. Publishers need to sell thousands of copies and they want books with that sort of appeal.

Authors that write a book they want to read tend to lose sight of the audience. I think that leads to self-absorbed and completely ineffective titles like “The Legend of Edarotag” and “Cimmeria’s Song*”. It may contribute to in-jokes and references that no one can relate to. As a rule, I think it’s safe to say that no one finds your interests as interesting as you do.

In conclusion, your career will probably be more successful if you forget about what you want to read and focus on finding what you can (and would be proud to) sell.

*These are both fictional titles (try reversing the letters in Edarotag).  I hope that demonstrated how easily in-jokes can disgruntle mass audiences.

2 responses so far

Jul 11 2008

A few questions for opinionated authors

The authors that try to present political or religious opinions usually confuse their opinions with insights. How is your message about, say, abortion different from what people have already heard about abortion? Your readers have already heard many people chant “abortion is good” and “abortion is bad.” Is your story just another voice in the chorus or will it actually add something? Why will anyone care about your opinion? Do you have any unique perspective on the subject material? Do you have relevant professional or scholarly experience? Are you personally affected by the issue? Etc.

Continue Reading »

No responses yet

Jul 03 2008

A brief argument: reviewers don’t have to be credentialed to be relevant

Published by B. Mac under Book Review, Commentary, Non-Comedy

When authors or fans challenge negative reviews, they sometimes say something like “what have you written, because I bet it’s awful.” I think that reflects a fundamentally wrong conception of reviewing. Every day, people evaluate and suggest things without any experience of having made them. For example, over the past few years I’ve suggested that friends stay away from (ugly) Pontiac Azteks, (shoddy) Craftsman tools, and (inedible) McDonald’s food. But I’ve never designed a car, built a tool and hardly ever cook. Does my lack of experience disqualify me as a relevant reviewer?

Continue Reading »

No responses yet

Jul 02 2008

Season 3 of Heroes will have MORE characters!

The creator of Heroes, Tim Kring, has promised that season 3 will have more villains. Yes, more characters… that’s exactly what Heroes needed.

“You’re going to see a lot of bad guys,” he said to Sci Fi Wire. “We’re playing off the idea of our characters as heroes or villains. So it’s really the duality of good and evil.” T.K., I will see your duality of good and evil and raise you character development, interesting traits and a well-rounded cast. For one, I’d start by killing off about half the cast…

Continue Reading »

No responses yet

Jun 07 2008

A Quip About Ulysses

Ulysses is a totally incomprehensible book. Understanding it is like machine-gunning a pack of unicorns. Anyone that claims to have done either is lying, but should be institutionalized anyway.”

–Cadet Davis

No responses yet

May 21 2008

Future Cops, 1. Academics, 0

Published by B. Mac under Comedy, Commentary, National service

This is an excerpt from an interesting article on college.

I assigned a research paper. This time around, the students were to elucidate the positions of scholars on two sides of a historical controversy. Why did Truman remove MacArthur? Did the United States covertly support the construction of the Berlin Wall? Their job in the paper, as I explained it, was to take my arm and introduce me as a stranger to scholars A, B, and C, who stood on one side of the issue, and to scholars D, E, and F, who were firmly on the other—as though they were hosting a party.

A future state trooper snorted. “Some party,” he said.

No responses yet

May 18 2008

What!?!

Published by B. Mac under Comedy, Commentary

The US government has introduced a fitness test for adults. Did you know that the government thinks it’s “normal” to have a 500-inch waist circumference?

I’m going to go out on a limb and say that if you have a 500 inch waist, you probably do not have a 24.1 BMI.

No responses yet

Apr 15 2008

Quote of the Day (April 15)

It is only when a politician speaks clearly that he is required to “clarify” himself.

–paraphrased from Thomas Sowell

No responses yet

Mar 20 2008

Something is clearly missing here…

The conservative Washington Times reports on the latest feud between Senators Obama and Clinton.

Continue Reading »

No responses yet

Mar 07 2008

I *really* hope this was taken out of context

Published by B. Mac under Commentary, News, Politics

The New Yorker covered Senator Obama’s wife delivering a speech…

Continue Reading »

No responses yet

Feb 07 2008

Are you going to hell?

Right now the market thinks that Romney has a .5% of winning the GOP nomination. That means you can get 200:1 odds on him winning it.

“But Romney has suspended his campaign!” you say. “He can’t win it!”

Actually, he still could. McCain is 72 years old and may be medically forced to withdraw from the race before he is officially named the nominee in August. If he does, then I think Romney will be in a better position to take charge at what will probably be the wildest presidential convention in American history.

Continue Reading »

No responses yet

Jan 29 2008

Heroes got sued

Published by B. Mac under Commentary, Heroes

The gist of the lawsuit is that Heroes supposedly ripped off a preexisting plotline that where an artist painted the future and included the (possible) destruction of two New York City landmarks.

 

If this lawsuit works out, I’m going to sue every romance publisher because they’ve all ripped off a story I wrote last year where a guy and a girl struggle through adversity and finally get together.

 

(Wait a minute…)

 

I’m not sure I can think of a superhero story set in the real world where a New York landmark isn’t endangered. In fact, superhero stories are probably more likely to endanger NYC landmarks than romances are to show guys and girls getting together some romances are tragedies).

 

As as for the supposed ripping-off of a superpower (painting the future), again pretty much every superpower is a direct and blatant ripoff of something that’s already been used. Some of the superpowers used on Heroes are…

  1. Superstrength

  2. Regeneration

  3. Flying

  4. Mind-reading

 

Groundbreaking stuff there!

No responses yet

Jan 28 2008

Overheard at the Sports Desk

Published by B. Mac under Comedy, Commentary, Sports

The [NY] Knicks need to let Isiah Thomas go. To quote Ozzy Ozbourne, the Knicks have been “going off the rails on a crazy train” for the past four years, and Thomas is the conductor. It’s time to cut this ride short.

–Mr. Andrews

No responses yet

Jan 28 2008

Seen Online

Published by B. Mac under Comedy, Comic books, Commentary

I got a kick out of this quote.

“A few years back, I suggested a new rule that no male writer should be allowed to write a female protagonist unless he had dated a woman at least once in his life.”

That’s fine, but that’s probably why there are so few (clothed) females in comic books.

No responses yet

Jan 23 2008

Wincing at CNN

Published by B. Mac under Commentary, Journalism, Politics

Continue Reading »

No responses yet

Jan 21 2008

Peter Parker & MJ break up?!? And Star Fox News.

I’ve written before that you have to keep the level of unusualness in your stories steady or things will feel really weird. Case in point: Peter Parker breaks up with Mary Jane. After making a pact with Mephisto. Who brings back Aunt May and Harry Osborn. (No word yet on whether Peter actually is a clone this time around).

 

There are a few ways to interpret this:

 

  1. Marvel admits it really screwed the pooch when they outed Spiderman during Civil War. Trying to fit Spiderman into a Fantastic Four-sized hole was not well thought-out.

  2. Marvel has decided it isn’t done screwing the pooch. There’s no other industry where companies feel the need to dilute their good products with their crap products*. Spiderman, meet Mephisto.

The Ubyssey suggests that Quesada was the main cause.

Joe Quesada, editor-in-chief of Marvel, had long been an opponent of Spider-Man’s marriage. A married Spider-Man, Joe felt, restricted the kind of stories that could be told. A single swinging Spidey, however, was free to “have sex and download porn.” Now, a simple divorce would have sufficed, and could reasonably be explained. But this, Quesada felt, would tarnish Peter’s status as a role model for kids.

If the Ubyssey is even remotely close on this, we can safely say that Marvel may actually be the worst-run entertainment company around.

  1. Unless Peter gets single, we can’t write stories where he can “have sex and download porn.”
  2. But a divorce would tarnish Peter’s status as a role model.
  3. Let’s have him make a pact with the devil instead.

Admittedly, things are different in NYC than Missouri, Illinois, Indiana, S.C. and Florida, but that’s just ridiculous.

*”There’s no other industry where companies dilute their good products with their crap products.” To some extent that’s hyperbole. Each new Star Fox game discredits the Nintendo brand as a whole. But at least Nintendo doesn’t force Star Fox plotlines on its actually good franchises.

Random tangent: I actually once had a mildly interesting premise for a Star Fox book. Well, really, it was more of a fever-induced delirium than a premise, but work with me.

Star Fox News.
Continue Reading »

No responses yet

Jan 07 2008

My spies report…

The UN plans to “use Spiderman to fight evil,” according to the Associated Press. (Wait, doesn’t the UN already have its own superheroes?)

The article mentions that…

John Bolton called it an “act of desperation… you can have Spiderman in a comic book all you want, but it’s not going to change public perception.”

John’s wrong. Adding Spidey to a comic book always changes public perception about its quality. For example, take Spiderman: Get Kraven. It made it to issue six, out of a scheduled seven. Get Kraven would not have survived to two.
Just how bad was Get Kraven?

Get Kraven #1

Kraven 1

Makes you wonder what they did for 2-6, right?

Savor excerpts of a review of #1:

It works, in the same way that selling Pokemon toys to children works. The characters don’t go challenging any boundaries, except those of good taste.

Spidey’s appearance is best quickly forgotten…

Get Kraven #2

Kraven 2

Incidentally, the mini-WTC logo is the only reason this comic should not be burned.

Excerpts of a review:

it’s about as witty as two-day old vomit down the back of the sofa. It’s as funny as a draft notice in 1967 [hey!] It’s as clever as a Ph.D thesis in pig-latin*…

Namor swims up and gives him some advice about Hollywood…

SUMMARY: Renting a bungalow. Scott Baio. Six pages.

*Which is different from regular theses… how?

Get Kraven #6 (skipping 3-5 for everyone’s well-being)

Kraven 6

Wait… the WTC logo is gone.  Light it up!

If you actually bought this, you have no one to blame but yourself.

Here are some excerpts of a five-star review of #6.

The Rothsteins weren’t the head of the snake. They need to go to Beverly Hills…

It turns out, Ned is playing a role playing game with the Chameleon because it’s healthy, according to his shrink. The Chameleon snaps, he takes a spear and runs towards Al…

The story ends with Nickles [THE F***ING DOG] wondering that this was supposed to be a seven issue series. And that it’s weird that he waited to the last page to talk!

Anyway, the point is that Spidey got Get Kraven to issue six. After that, world peace should be a snap.

In any case, he can sell a comic that will be heavy on the preaching and light on the miracles.

No responses yet

Jan 03 2008

Texan Headline of the Day

Dallas Police, Officials Discourage Random Gunfire.”

Uhh… what were the Dallas police doing before?

On a side-note, I think the Dallas police will find that it’s easier to cut murders by reducing targeted gunfire.

No responses yet

Next »